Matter, Eternity, Time

[socratus]

Matter, Eternity, Time
======.
Cantime exist without matter?
According to Newton the answer is “ Yes”
According to Einstein the answer is “ No”
Who is right, who is wrong?
#
Newton declared that time is absolute and wrote that time
“ flows equably without relation to anything external”.
Einstein had another opinion.
According to SRT / GRT time is relative and depends on the mass and speed
It means that different moving mass-bodies can create different time.
It also means that space and time is only a result of some physical process
of moving mass / moving particles. The cause for time and space to be able
to appear is moving mass (moving particles).
============= …
Eternity and Time.
a)
Thereis different *gravity time*.
The*gravity time* depends on mass / matter and its movement.
Forexample, every planet has its own *time* (gravity time)
b)
Thereis Minkowski negative -4D timespace(without Newtonian matter).
Minkowski -4D is*timeless* - zero vacuum continuum: T=0K.
T=0Kis an eternal continuum, an absolute reference frame.
c)
Indifferent local parts of *eternal vacuum * T=0K is possible to see
planets with their own *time*. For us the *Earthtime* is absolute,
butfrom vacuum's point of view (Einsteinium) *Earth time* is relative.
============..

 

[spaminator]

Matter, Eternity, Time

its only a matter of time before your account gets locked. it won't take an eternity.

 

[MHz]

Time and matter always exist, it just become impractical to use the same standards. In this universe matter can clump together to form objects that give off light. Time in that place is 1,000 years is a day compared to what we can do here on earth in one 24 hour day (travel distance) The universe is said to keep expanding and that would result in the same amount of matter but the area it is in is so vast nothing can clump together to shed any light, measuring time in that place would use a multiple of what the 1,000 years is in terms of defining what one day is.

 

[Cliffy]

It doesn't matter.

 

[socratus]

Matter, Eternity, Time
======.
Cantime exist without matter?
According to Newton the answer is “ Yes”
According to Einstein the answer is “ No”
Who is right, who is wrong?
#
Newton declared that time is absolute and wrote that time
“ flows equably without relation to anything external”.
Einstein had another opinion.
According to SRT / GRT time is relative and depends on the mass and speed
It means that different moving mass-bodies can create different time.
It also means that space and time is only a result of some physical process
of moving mass / moving particles. The cause for time and space to be able
to appear is moving mass (moving particles).
============= …
Eternity and Time.
a)
Thereis different *gravity time*.
The*gravity time* depends on mass / matter and its movement.
Forexample, every planet has its own *time* (gravity time)
b)
Thereis Minkowski negative -4D timespace(without Newtonian matter).
Minkowski -4D is*timeless* - zero vacuum continuum: T=0K.
T=0Kis an eternal continuum, an absolute reference frame.
c)
Indifferent local parts of *eternal vacuum * T=0K is possible to see
planets with their own *time*. For us the *Earthtime* is absolute,
butfrom vacuum's point of view (Einsteinium) *Earth time* is relative.
============..

d)
Ifquantum of light travels at constantspeed c=1 its time *is frozen*.
(timelessparticle)
The*time* appears when quantum of light changesits speed c=1.
Thisis not *gravity time* it is another kind of *time*.
Theprocess when quantum of light keeps its changeable condition
is called *personal time* of quantum of light .
The *personal time* of quantum of light is explained by SRT.
============…

 

[socratus]

A time varying speed of light as a solution tocosmological puzzles
Authors: Andreas Albrecht, Joao Magueijo
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/9811018

 

[socratus]

A man decided.
One circle of Earth around the Sun is a year.
A year is 12 months.
A month is 30 days'
A day is 24 hours.
A hour is 60 minutes.
. . . . etc
For us this Earth's time is an absolute fact.
But every planet has its own year, own time.
For example: Martian year and time hasanother measuring.
A year on Mars lasts twice as long as Earth'syear.
Here we are talking about *gravity time*.
So, if somebody want to know *what time is* then he needs
to understand *how were the planets created?*,
*where did matter come from?*
(the famous big bang doesn't give the answer to this question)
#
And what is about the space between planets /stars /galaxies?
This is space of infinite/ eternal *cold kingdom* T=0K with
*negative virtual particles* -E=Mc^2.
Somehow (through vacuum transformation/ fluctuation/polarization,
quantum tunnelingphenomena ) these *negative virtual particles*
become real particles E=h*f.
These particles (E=h*f) can create everything in the Universe.
=====================…

 

[socratus]

Without *gravity* there isn't *time*.
The *time* ( together with gravity) was created from eternity (T=0K)
according to Einstein's GRT.
==..

 

[darkbeaver]

Times a conceptual illusion of distance.. Everything that can be already is. There is nothing new under the sun, or in it.

The following announcement heralds the end of the reign of the Lunatic Anti Electric Gravity Buffoonery.

Does Hawking mind being wrong?
Everyone hates being wrong – and Hawking is human. On his 70th birthday, he told New Scientist that he regards his idea that information was destroyed by black holes, which later turned out to be wrong, as his "biggest blunder" – in science, at least.
New Scientist is in the process of contacting Stephen Hawking for comment on his latest paper.
Journal reference: arxiv.org/abs/1401.5761

Without *gravity* there isn't *time*.
The *time* ( together with gravity) was created from eternity (T=0K)
according to Einstein's GRT.
==..

With out electric current there is no gravity. Einstein is a mythological figure in a fable. Time is distance.

 

[darkbeaver]

Thunderbolts YouTube Channel

Hawking Still in the Dark on Black Holes | Space News
February 5, 2014 by B Talbott
Listen as mathematician Stephen Crothers tells us why not much has changed since Stephen Hawking’s recent “revelation” in his 4-page paper in Nature. Crothers will be a featured speaker at the upcoming Electric Universe 2014 Conference : All About Evidence, … Continue reading →