The photon and the electron are one and the same particle in different conditions.

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,126
17
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org
The photon and the electron are one and the same particle indifferent conditions.

=.

In every physical text-book is possible to read that the photon

and the electron are very different particles.

What do we know about them?

About photon Einstein wrote:

‘ All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me

no nearer to the answerto the question, 'What are light quanta?'

Nowadays every Tom, **** and Harry thinks he knows it,

but he is mistaken. ‘

And we don't know why the electron has six ( 6 ) formulas

E=h*f , e^2=ah*c , +E=Mc^2 and -E=Mc^2 ,

E=-me^4/2h*^2= -13,6eVand E= ∞

We don't know: what are interactions between them.

=.

Now physicists think that electron interacts with another usingphoton.

But Russian physicist V. Rydnik wrote:

' Now take the electron. Even if its velocity is close to that

of light – 10^10 cm/s –it will have a momentum of only

about 10^-17 g cm/s. Thegamma photon used for

illumination has a veryshort wavelength ( say, 6 10^13 cm)

and a momentum of 10^-14, which is thousands of times that

of the electron. So, whena photon hits an electron, it is like

a railway train smashinginto a baby- carriage.’

/ ABC’s of quantum mechanics. By V. Rydnik.Page 98-99. /

So, electron cannot interact with photon in such way.
====.
a)
when photon moves with constant speed c=1 – it is a flat particle and
electron is usually takenas a sphere- particle.
The photon and the electron are not a firm constant particles,
their geometrical form can be changed.
b)
In the QM the electron follows Fermi- Dirac (fermion) statistics =
uses only h*=h/2pi(Pauli Exclusion Law )
while the photon follows Bose- Einstein (boson) statistics = uses only h.
c)
Every quantum particle possess dualistic ability
(simultaneous wave-corpusculardualism)
==============…
My idea.
The photon and the electron are one and the same particle in different
conditions and the *simultaneouscorpuscular/wave dualism* phenomena
of quantum particle can provemy idea.
I say: every quantum particle has not only one (1) but two (2)different own,
Inner impulses (spins).
By the linear spin h=1 quantum - particle receives straight – uniform
movement with constantspeed c=1
Using the linear spin h=1 quantum particle behaviors as a corpuscular
(there isn't anyelectromagnetic radiation)
By the angular spin h*=h/2pi quantum-particle rotates around itsdiameter
and its speed is fasterthan c=1. Its speed is c>1 as a frequency of particle.
The rotating frequency of particle creates waves.
The independent quantum particlecan use own / inner linear or angular
(and vice versa) impulsedepends on situation. ( h <==> h*=h/2pi)
=.
Quote by Heinrich Hertz on Maxwell's equations:

"One cannot escape the feeling that these mathematicalformulae
have an independent existence and an intelligence of their own,
that they are wiser than we are, wiser even than their discoverers,
that we get more out of them than was originally put into them."

Can we understand the wisdom of the quantum particle?

==.
 

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,126
17
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org

If the electron is truly a dimensionlesspoint then the idea of spin

inthe classical sense is without meaning.

Butif the electron isn't a *point* but has some geometrical form

thenthe idea of spin in the classicalsense has meaning.

=.

What is electron's geometrical form? It has a sphere form.

What is photon's geometrical form ? It has a flat (circle) form.

Is it possible using h or h* understandtheir unity?



In the beginning of 1950 de Broglie and Heisenberg

tried to unit them without mathematical (!) success.
=.
 

Omicron

Privy Council
Jul 28, 2010
1,694
3
38
Vancouver
A single electron is not interchangeable with a photon... you need a positron plus an electron to make a photon... and a photon with sufficient energy will not render just an electron... it will render an electron plus a positron.

Don't confuse that with how particles with the electromagnetic field use photons as their particle-of-exchange... that's a different issue.
 

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,126
17
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org

* The Law of conservation and transformation of energy/ mass*and photon/electron.

a)

The simple *banal* electron has six ( 6 ) formulas:

( E=h*f , e^2=ah*c , +E=Mc^2 and -E=Mc^2 ,

E=-me^4/2h*^2=-13,6eV , E= ∞ ) and we don't know

what interactions between them are.

b)

According to QED in interaction with vacuum all electron'sparameters

becomes infinite. That is impossible according to

“ The law of conservation (!) energy/mass”.

But it can be possible according to

“ The law of transformation (!) energy/mass”

The problem: we don’t know: what *transformation* means

according to one single electron.

#

Taking only ‘The law ofconservation of energy’ is a half-truth.

By half- truth we are deceived ourselves.

Taking only law of transformation of energy is also ahalf-truth.

By other half- truth we are deceived ourselves too.

If somebody takes only one part of the whole law ( conservation)

and ignore the second part of it (transformation) then he isfalsifier.

Only together

“ The law of conservation and transformation energy/mass” istrue law.

#

Physicists don't understand what to do with electron's infinitesizes,

and therefore they had invented *a method of renormalization*,

a method *to sweep the dust under the carpet* / Feynman./

#

If somebody think that , “ The Law of preservation andtransformation

of energy/ mass “ is a simple bookkeeping calculation ofdebit-credit

he is mistaken. It is a primitive judgment about one of the most

important Law in Nature. It is merchant’s opinion.

Why?

Because on the one hand the bookkeeping calculation ofdebit-credit is

“ a symmetry law”. ( like 1$ is 100 cents )

But on the other hand the life in the Universe begins with

disturb of symmetry.

The occurrence of Life in the Universe is connected not withsymmetry,

but with breaking of symmetry.

For something to happen there has to be a "brokensymmetry".

( It means 1$ is not equal to 100 cents.)

Here ( in the broken symmetry) appears the effect of ‘transformation’.

Ouestion.

What does " The Law of Conservationand Transformation

of Energy/ Mass" mean according to onesingle electron?

How can electron keep its local parameters at interaction withvacuum

according to “The law of conservation and transformation energy/mass” ?
My opinion.


When electron E=h*f interacts with vacuum T=0K all itsparameters change into

virtual –particles (antielectron) with the negative energy:-E=Mc^2.

If this antielectron uses impulse h=1 – it becomes photon c=1.

(this corpuscular in its constant straight movement doesn'tcreate waves)

If this antielectron uses impulse h*=h/2pi – it becomeselectron: E=h*f.

(this corpuscular in its revolving movement (frequency) createswaves)

#

In 1924, trying to understand the*simultaneous corpuscular/wave dualism*,

de Broglie invented *the mechanism by whicha particle was guided by its pilot wave*

It means that particle for de Broglie wassecondary part of *pilot wave*

I say that the quantum particle (photon/electron) is cause of *pilot wave*

===…

Best wishes

Israel Sadovnik Socratus
 

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,126
17
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org

Sometime quantum oflight travels as a photon ( h=1, c=1, h=Et)

Sometime quantum oflight works as an electron in an atom (h*=h/2pi, c>1)

When electron ends itswork in atom it jumps out with the energy E=h*f

Later the energy E=h*fchanges into Planck's light quanta / photon h=Et

The photon (h=1, c=1, h=Et) in the zero vacuum T=0Kchanges into

*rest- freeze* quantum of light with negativeenergy: -E=Mc^2.

In every electron ishidden this *negative* energy that sometime can be

so active+E=Mc^2, that it can destroy citieslike Hiroshima and Nagasaki

=.

 

socratus

socratus
Dec 10, 2008
1,126
17
38
Israel
www.worldnpa.org

Electron and positron are one and the same particle in differentconditions.
==..
Accordingto QED in interaction with vacuum all electron's parameters
become infinite: E= ∞ . That isimpossible, because it is forbidden
by * The Law of conservation and transformationof energy/ mass*
(to shun this problem using "a method of renormalization" is
"to sweep the dust under thecarpet" / according to Feynman / )
Whatis possible?
Mysuggestion.
Accordingto Dirac in his so-called *vacuum holes-sea* well known
*virtual particles* exist with negative energy; -E=Mc^2.

Thenin interaction with vacuum allelectron's parameters changed
into negative parameters and become * virtual– positrons* : –E=Mc^2
Thesevirtual positrons (antimatter - dark matter) using the well-known
*tunneling jump - phenomena * can emerge as a real particle: E=h*f.
=====…



Does the positron 'excess' really exist?
http://physicsworld.com/cws/article/news/2013/nov/27/does-the-positron-excess-really-exist

Positron is an electron's shadow like as
"The entropy is only a shadow of energy" / W. Ostwald /
==..