60% of Albertans will get a full rebate for carbon tax

tay

Hall of Fame Member
May 20, 2012
11,548
0
36
Five Facts About Alberta’s New Carbon Tax


Let’s start with the most obvious place Albertans will notice a difference: the gas station.

The carbon tax translates to an increase of 4.49 cents per litre. For a 50-litre tank, that means it’ll cost an extra $2.25 to fill up. While you’d likely rather spend that on a double-double, it’s probably not going to break the bank.

What about the much feared knock-on effects of the price on carbon? It’s estimated the tax will increase the indirect costs of consumer goods by about $50 to $70 per person in 2017.

But before you start reaching for your piggy bank: 60 per cent of Albertans will receive a full rebate for the carbon tax (all single households with a net income under $47,500 and all couples or families with a net income under $95,000). Another six per cent of households will receive a partial rebate.

In addition, the rebates are tied to income level, not the amount of energy one actually uses, meaning that Albertans can effectively make money from the carbon tax if they use a lower-than-average amount of energy — which is kind of the point.

Two-thirds of households will receive money back and the first cheques will be in the mail this month. There’s no need to apply. Albertans will automatically receive a rebate if they submitted a 2015 tax return and are under the cutoff.

What about the upper third of income earners in Alberta? They will have to pay the full cost of the tax — however, they also have the option to do things like make their homes more energy efficient or choose a more fuel efficient vehicle to reduce the cost. Rebates and incentives will be available for purchasing and installing new energy-efficient appliances, products and systems.

And investments enabled by the revenue generated by the tax — in renewable energy, public transit and energy efficiency — will make it easier for everyone to reduce their emissions.

https://www.desmog.ca/2017/01/01/five-handy-facts-about-alberta-s-new-carbon-tax
 

Decapoda

Council Member
Mar 4, 2016
1,682
801
113
So...the point of this is to tax wealthy carbon emitters only? Is carbon dioxide emitted by lower income people somehow less of a concern to the environment? This seems to reinforce the notion that carbon taxes are nothing more than a massive wealth transfer scheme snd have nothing to do with saving the planet from devastating warming.
 

Curious Cdn

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 22, 2015
37,070
6
36
So...the point of this is to tax wealthy carbon emitters only? Is carbon emitted by lower income emitters somehow less of a concern to the envirinment? This seem to reinforce the notion that carbinvtaxes are nothing more than a massive wealth transfer scheme snd have nothing to do with saving the planet from devastating warming.

The point of this tax is more revenue so that the federal and provincial Liberals can dole out goodies prior to elections and buy our votes with our own money.
 

EagleSmack

Hall of Fame Member
Feb 16, 2005
44,168
95
48
USA
So...the point of this is to tax wealthy carbon emitters only? Is carbon emitted by lower income emitters somehow less of a concern to the envirinment? This seem to reinforce the notion that carbon taxes are nothing more than a massive wealth transfer scheme snd have nothing to do with saving the planet from devastating warming.

BadaBING!
 

Cannuck

Time Out
Feb 2, 2006
30,245
99
48
Alberta

Decapoda

Council Member
Mar 4, 2016
1,682
801
113
It’s interesting how only a few short years ago a liberal election campaign was completely annihilated with the promise of a “green shift” plan…criticised by almost everyone as nothing more than a deceitful, complex and bureaucratic tax grab, yet a few years later the same policy dressed up with a nice hair doo and fluffy disposition is welcomed with open arms to many of the same liberal lemmings as they march us off the cliff.

I guess Trudeau’s vacuous strategy must have worked. Dion’s problem is that he developed and laid out a detailed policy with the announcement of his green shift plan. He owned it. Trudeau on the other hand, as he typically does, announced his policy without a plan. He simply made an announcement (while the first ministers were in the middle of a meeting collaboratively discussing the policy’s foundation) that it would be the provinces responsibility on how they would implement his imposed targets on carbon.

This is what happens when you leave kids in charge, stuff gets broken but no one has the courage to step up and take responsibility.
 

taxslave

Hall of Fame Member
Nov 25, 2008
36,362
4,337
113
Vancouver Island
Five Facts About Alberta’s New Carbon Tax


Let’s start with the most obvious place Albertans will notice a difference: the gas station.

The carbon tax translates to an increase of 4.49 cents per litre. For a 50-litre tank, that means it’ll cost an extra $2.25 to fill up. While you’d likely rather spend that on a double-double, it’s probably not going to break the bank.

What about the much feared knock-on effects of the price on carbon? It’s estimated the tax will increase the indirect costs of consumer goods by about $50 to $70 per person in 2017.

But before you start reaching for your piggy bank: 60 per cent of Albertans will receive a full rebate for the carbon tax (all single households with a net income under $47,500 and all couples or families with a net income under $95,000). Another six per cent of households will receive a partial rebate.

In addition, the rebates are tied to income level, not the amount of energy one actually uses, meaning that Albertans can effectively make money from the carbon tax if they use a lower-than-average amount of energy — which is kind of the point.

Two-thirds of households will receive money back and the first cheques will be in the mail this month. There’s no need to apply. Albertans will automatically receive a rebate if they submitted a 2015 tax return and are under the cutoff.

What about the upper third of income earners in Alberta? They will have to pay the full cost of the tax — however, they also have the option to do things like make their homes more energy efficient or choose a more fuel efficient vehicle to reduce the cost. Rebates and incentives will be available for purchasing and installing new energy-efficient appliances, products and systems.

And investments enabled by the revenue generated by the tax — in renewable energy, public transit and energy efficiency — will make it easier for everyone to reduce their emissions.

https://www.desmog.ca/2017/01/01/five-handy-facts-about-alberta-s-new-carbon-tax

So as usual for a socialist government the top producers end up carrying the load for the freeloaders even if they produce less emissions. Meaning this is not about the environment but yet another tax gouge on the rich. Actually not even the rich since most people working in industry will make over the $95000.

You know it is a tax scam when Indian bands are exempt. As are exports under BC carbon tax scam.
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
After reading up on it we need to raise it a lot so the rebates are higher.
Do we still have that Northern Living Allowance because it needs to be moved south a bit?
 

MHz

Time Out
Mar 16, 2007
41,030
43
48
Red Deer AB
Where I was we only got 50% as they used the start of the Alaska Highway as the starting point for 100%.
 

damngrumpy

Executive Branch Member
Mar 16, 2005
9,949
21
38
kelowna bc
As a person who leans left or right depending on the issue I think the carbon tax
is well meaning and demonstrating government is doing something. When in fact
it is not. You can sequester all the carbon we want and nature will thwart our
efforts every year. One forest fire for three days will wipe out any gain made by
man.
The money would be better spent informing people as to how the individually can
make a difference by being aware of their own waste. It would be cheaper and more
effective. As it is charging more means people will pay more and the price will go
up. Carbon sequester will not go down in the long run
Its a nice thought but we are setting ourselves up for failure down the road and people
pay into things that ultimately fail are angry voters down the road
the truth is carbon sequester by governments is a waste of time like the king who went
to the edge of the sea to stop the tide from coming in. We all know how that turned out